Imagine purchasing stock in a business whose income almost quadrupled, only to learn that Wall Street believes the stock may be valued between $80 and $265.
That is the unusual situation facing Palantir Technologies (PLTR) investors.
Citigroup analyst Tyler Radke raised his price target to $265 from $250 on Nov. 3, maintaining a Buy rating.
Brent Thill, a Jefferies analyst, came to a very different conclusion. His firm maintained an Underperform rating and an $80 target, according to The Fly.
The difference is $185 per share, exceeding Palantir’s entire $175.40 closing share price on Nov. 3.
That translates into roughly 51% potential upside under Citi’s target or 54% downside under Jefferies’ estimate.
Both companies evaluated the identical third-quarter figures, which revealed a 96% increase in sales and an acceleration of the demand for AI software.
This creates a difficult situation for the average investor. How can a business do so well while Wall Street disagrees so strongly about its share value?
The response reveals as much about Palantir as it does about the price investors are ready to pay for AI.
Citi sees an AI business delivering extraordinary growth
Palantir‘s Nov. 2 earnings release helps explain the enthusiasm of optimistic experts.
The company reported third-quarter revenue of $2.31 billion, up 96% from a year earlier. For the first time, its U.S. commercial business, which climbed 148% to $984 million, surpassed its U.S. government income of $953 million.
This is significant, since Palantir’s development is no longer mostly dependent on government and military organizations. The company’s potential market is growing as more private companies pay for its AI-powered software.
Additionally, Palantir reported adjusted free cash flow of $1.22 billion, or a 53% margin. Management increased its projected revenue for 2026 to about $8.53 billion, or 91% annual growth.
Citi called the quarter “another top-line blowout,” according to Yahoo Finance, citing strength in both government and commercial revenue.
The bullish argument is simple. Palantir’s current value may someday seem more realistic if it keeps growing at an exceptional rate while retaining high profit margins.
The company also has financial flexibility, thanks to $10.4 billion in cash, equivalents, and U.S. Treasury securities.
“We have now essentially doubled our entire business since the same quarter last year,” Palantir CEO Alex Karp said.
However, a stock’s strong financial performance does not always translate into an appealing price, as Jefferies’ target shows.
Jefferies sees a much bigger valuation problem
Jefferies acknowledges that Palantir delivered strong results.
Its concern is whether the company can maintain such extraordinary growth as its revenue base becomes larger.
More Wall Street:
- Nvidia and Micron are about to lord their successes all over Wall Street
- Nvidia, Palantir, and Alphabet send waves through Wall Street
- Wall Street elites will pocket windfall from record $46 billion profits
Jefferies believes Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), and Snowflake (SNOW) are better AI investments due to their valuations and growth potential, according to The Fly.
Examining Palantir’s market value makes the issue more apparent. At its Nov. 3 closing price, Palantir was valued at approximately $421.5 billion. That is about 49 times the $8.53 billion in annual revenue Palantir expects to generate in 2026.
Therefore, rather than just the company’s current profits, investors are paying for years of significant future growth.
When sales and earnings continue to be above forecasts, that may be effective. But even if the business remains profitable, it becomes risky when growth stops.
A company that grows by 40% or 50% a year would typically get a lot of attention from investors. However, it may still be a significant letdown for a business with prices as aggressive as Palantir’s.
Jefferies isn’t saying that Palantir’s AI technology isn’t working. It questions whether shareholders are paying too much for that success.
Palantir investors face a test beyond the price targets
Jefferies’ $80 target and Citi’s $265 forecast are not set in stone.
Analyst targets reflect assumptions about future growth, profits, and the value that investors would accept. These presumptions are subject to sudden modification.
Palantir also has a strong argument against the bearish view.
Its adjusted free cash flow margin of 53% demonstrates that significant cash creation coincides with rapid expansion. And management expects fourth-quarter revenue of approximately $2.65 billion, above the $2.46 billion analysts anticipated, according to Reuters.
This allows investors to track quantifiable changes.
Is it possible for commercial income to continue growing at such a remarkable rate? Can Palantir maintain its strong profit margins as it expands? Will future profits support a market valuation that is currently more than $400 billion?
There is much more to such questions than just picking the correct analyst.
A shareholder who purchased Palantir at a much lower price must make a different choice than someone who is considering making a fresh acquisition at about $175.
The first investor may have significant profits to safeguard, while the second needs sufficient future growth to offset the risk that the market may someday value Palantir at a lower level.
The $185 dispute is illuminating because of the stakes involved.
Palantir is growing into a significant AI software company, according to Wall Street. The unanswered question is how much of that future success investors have already paid for.
Related: Palantir’s CEO just called the old-school software sales model ‘dead’